Same rules. Every speaker. Every claim.

AI4U TRUTH TASK FORCE evaluates factual propositions, not political worth, character, ideology, electability or voter preference. It does not endorse candidates or policies.

Claim selection

Claims are prioritized by public reach, consequence, checkability, evidentiary availability and public relevance. The reason a political claim was selected must be recorded in its ledger.

Evidence standard

Equivalent claims receive equivalent standards regardless of speaker or party. Research must actively seek credible evidence both supporting and undermining the proposition, prioritize inspectable primary records where appropriate, preserve material context, disclose relevant source interests, and distinguish copies from independent roots.

Speaker response

Where practical and proportionate, the claimant or authorized representative may submit supporting evidence. Their evidence receives the same provenance, independence and relevance checks as every other source.

No person-level truth score

Truth Task Force does not compute an overall “honesty,” “lie,” or candidate score. Claim-level results may be browsed individually; users make their own political judgments.